What Linear is for engineering, OpsKit is for the people-ops, finance-ops, and customer-ops folks running the rest of the company.
The problem
Ops teams at growing startups inherit Notion-databases-of-Notion-databases. Each function (people, finance, IT, CS) ends up with its own duct-taped tracker because Linear is too dev-shaped (issues, sprints, branches), and Asana is too generic. The result: every Tuesday all-hands is half spent reconciling "what's the actual status of <thing>" because three sources of truth disagree. Founders eventually hire an Ops Manager whose first 90 days are spent migrating six Notion DBs into one — and then the next quarter migrating that one into something else.
Our approach
OpsKit is opinionated where Linear is opinionated. Workflows for the ops-shaped work patterns: vendor onboarding, customer escalations, hiring loops, AP/AR. Each function ships a template, not a blank canvas. The core primitives are projects and runs (a run is a single instance of a workflow, e.g. "onboard Acme Corp as a vendor") with status, owner, due date, and structured fields. The opinionated bit: we ship the workflows, you don't draw them. If your process doesn't fit a template, fork it — but you start from a real template, not from scratch.
Where we are
12 design-partner companies using a private alpha. 4 paying $99/mo to keep their seat once we hit GA. The wedge so far is people-ops (hiring loops + offboarding) — that's where the Notion-pain is sharpest. Building toward a public launch in 6-8 weeks once the customer-ops template ships.
Where we're going
Every function in the company runs on the same plane. Cross-functional dependencies become legible (people-ops's onboarding waits on IT-ops's laptop provisioning waits on finance-ops's PO approval) without anyone having to copy a Notion link into a Slack DM. Eventually: workflow analytics that tell you which step is the actual bottleneck instead of vibes.
Design partners
12
Paying
4
MRR
$396
TEAM
Alice BuilderFounder
@alice_qa